MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409198471 · doi:10.1101/2025.04.04.25324181

Greater Large Conducting Airway Luminal Area in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease

2025· preprint· en· W4409198471 on OpenAlexafffund
Alex J. Miller, Erik A. Ovrom, Solomiia Zaremba, Jonathon W. Senefeld, Chad C. Wiggins, Paolo B. Dominelli, Juan G. Ripoll, Brian T. Welch, Michael J. Joyner, Andrew H. Ramsook

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAirwayInterstitial lung diseaseMedicineLungDiseaseCardiologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses multiple pulmonary disorders characterized by damaged pulmonary tissue caused by a sequence of inflammation and fibrosis. While much is known about ILD-associated changes within the parenchyma and the pathophysiological processes underpinning the disruption of pulmonary dynamics and gas exchange, less is known about ILD-associated changes of luminal area within the large conducting airways. We aimed to investigate whether luminal area of the large conducting airways is different between patients with ILD and healthy controls. In a retrospective case-control study, luminal areas of seven large conducting airways were measured using three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography imaging. Patients with ILD (N=82; 54% female) were compared to control subjects matched for age, sex, and height. Univariate ANOVA tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze group and sex differences. Patients with ILD had greater large conducting airway luminal areas than control subjects for measured large conducting airways, including the trachea (296±73 vs. 247±65 mm 2 , P <0.001), right main bronchus (214±59 vs. 161±46 mm 2 , P <0.001), bronchus intermediate (123±32 vs. 94±28 mm 2 , P <0.001), right upper lobe (81±22 vs. 61±20 mm 2 , P <0.001), left main bronchus (151±41 vs. 119±35 mm 2 , P <0.001), left lower lobe (71±22 vs. 48±15 mm 2 , P <0.001), and left upper lobe (86±21 vs. 68±22 mm 2 , P <0.001). Among patients with ILD, males had 17-34% greater luminal areas (normalized to height) than females depending on the airway segment (all P <0.05). NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study provides evidence that interstitial lung disease (ILD) is associated with greater large conducting airway luminal area, even if matched for key characteristics (age, sex, and height). Consistent with observations in health, adult males with ILD had greater height-normalized large conducting luminal areas than adult females with ILD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→