MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409199440 · doi:10.70135/seejph.vi.6227

CLINICAL EFFICACY OF VASANTKUSUMAKAR RASA IN DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY: A RANDOMIZED SINGLE BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL

2025· article· en· W4409199440 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. V. Sathe, Madhavi Reddy M

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth Eastern European Journal of Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeripheral neuropathySingle blindRandomized controlled trialClinical trialInternal medicinePeripheralDiabetes mellitusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is the most important and under-treated microvascular complication of Diabetes Mellitus. The symptoms- tingling, numbness, pricking pain, allodynia- generally commence in the legs and show a stocking glove pattern. Few FDA- approved drugs like pregabalin, gabapentin, duloxetine are used as a part of management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the contemporary medicine. They are effective for symptomatic relief but are associated with significant adverse effects. Post-covid era has evolved as the most promising one for exploration of alternative medicine. Rasaushadhis (herbo-mineral/ metallic compounds) are potent drugs that are thought to work at cellular level. Vasantkusumakar Rasa is a promising drug for diabetic complications as earlier studies have proven its protective effects on nerves via anti-oxidant, micronutrient and immune-modulatory effects. This study was intended to assess its efficacy and safety in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Methodology: A double-arm single blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on 30 subjects having diabetic peripheral neuropathy, randomized into two groups- 15 in each. Control group was treated with placebo drug (125mg twice daily with water) and trial group was treated with Vasantkusumakar Rasa (125mg twice daily with cow’s ghee). A 30-day follow up (30th, 60th and 90th day) was planned for this study. Conventional anti-diabetic medications were continued in both the groups. Reduction in signs and symptoms using Toronto Clinical Scoring System score and indifference between the serum creatinine and liver function tests were primary outcomes; reduction in Vibration perception threshold using biothesiometer, Visual Analogue Scale and HbA1c were secondary outcomes. Paired t-test and 2 sample t-test were used for statistical analysis.Results: Vasantkusumakar Rasa posed a significant effect on diabetic peripheral neuropathy as p value is <0.05 for TCSS and VPT scores in trial group as compared to control group. Clinical safety of Vasantkusumakar Rasa was also evident as no adverse effects were observed on RFT and LFT parameters in trial group. (p value> 0.05)Conclusion: Vasantkusumakar Rasa is a promising Rasaushadhi that may prove to be beneficial in reducing symptoms of DPN as an add-on drug along with the conventional modern medications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouth Eastern European Journal of Public HealthSame topicPhytochemicals and Medicinal PlantsFrench-language works237,207