MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE ABBREVIATIVE ADVERBS OF THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE AS A MEANS OF LINGUISTIC ECONOMY IN THE SOCIAL MEDIA COMMUNICATION OF THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE 21ST CENTURY

2024· article· en· W4409201422 on OpenAlex
Olha Voronina

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFolia philologica. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiscourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianQuarter (Canadian coin)LinguisticsSocial mediaPolitical scienceHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article deals with the abbreviative adverbs and their role in linguistic economy of social media communication. The aim of the study is to identify the adverbs with the morpheme-abbreviation root as the newest derivatives, to study their structure, syntactic role and stylistic functions. We associate their emergence, in particular, with the principle of linguistic economy, which consists in simplifying speech efforts and is caused by the linguistic pragmatism of speakers. Social media communication in the first quarter of the 21st century has promoted the formation of capacious derivatives. Applying empirical research methods (observation, comparison, description), information and parametric analysis, analogy, heuristic methods, developing our research by the scientific induction method, we have found out that abbreviative adverbs formed from an adjectival abbreviative base constitute a small group of such derivatives, since not all adjectives of the Ukrainian language are capable of providing a derivational basis for adverbs. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that the analysis of abbreviative adverbs has not been covered to present extent in any studies before. We have come to the conclusions that today abbreviative adverbs are motivated only by abbreviative adjectival bases, at the same time most of abbreviative adverbs belong to the category of action mode and only a few adverbs are attributive. Most often, abbreviative adverbs occur as a substitute for syntagmatic constructions that are more capacious in terms of the number of linguistic signs – comparative phrases with an abbreviature as a main word. The process of abbreviative adverbs assimilation by the native speakers of Ukrainian language is also noticeable: in some syntactic constructions, there is a transition of adverb from its traditional prepredicate position (as a predicate modifier in place of a comparative syntactic construction) to the role of a subject modifier, a predicate or a modal word.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it