MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409202197 · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.03.002

Effect, Tolerability, and Safety of Exclusive Palatable Elemental Diet in Patients With Intestinal Microbial Overgrowth

2025· article· en· W4409202197 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ali Rezaie, Bianca W. Chang, Juliana de Freitas Germano, Gabriela Leite, Ruchi Mathur, Krystyna Houser, Ava Hosseini, Daniel Brimberry, Mohamad Rashid, Sepideh Mehravar, María Jesús Villanueva-Millán, Maritza Sanchez, Stacy Weitsman, Cristina M. Fajardo, Ignacio G. Rivera, LiJin Joo, Yin‐Ching Chan, Gillian M. Barlow, Mark Pimentel

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBausch Health
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityElemental dietSmall intestinal bacterial overgrowthGastroenterologyInternal medicineFood scienceAdverse effectParenteral nutritionIrritable bowel syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Elemental diets (EDs) have desirable safety and efficacy profiles in several clinical settings partly because of modulation of gut microbiome. Palatability of EDs remains the main barrier to compliance/adherence, and their effect has not been prospectively explored in microbiome-driven disorders, such as small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO). We aimed to assess the effect, tolerance, and safety of a novel palatable ED (PED) in subjects with IMO and/or SIBO. METHODS: Adult subjects with positive lactulose breath tests for SIBO and/or IMO completed 1 week of screening, 2 weeks of exclusive oral PED, and 2 weeks of follow-up during reintroduction of regular diet. Primary end point was changes in stool microbiome after PED and reintroduction of regular diet. Secondary end points included tolerability, rate of normalization of lactulose breath tests, change in stool form based on daily diary and artificial intelligence-analyzed images, symptomatic response, and adverse events. RESULTS: All 30 enrolled subjects tolerated the PED and completed the trial. Several taxonomic differences were detected including decreased relative abundance of Prevotella_9 and Fusobacterium. Abundance of Methanobrevibacter smithii decreased at the end of the trial and correlated with average daily methane levels (P = .024; r = 0.489). Maximum methane levels (41 ± 35 to 12 ± 15 ppm; P < .001) and hydrogen rise (43 ± 42 to 12 ± 11 ppm; P < .001) dropped significantly, with 73% normalizing their lactulose breath tests. Adequate global relief of symptoms was reported in 83% of subjects. No serious or severe adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: PED significantly impacts the gut microbiome. Tolerance to EDs improves with enhanced palatability. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess response durability. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05978973).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueClinical Gastroenterology and HepatologySame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207