Global Trends in Research of Intestinal Cells and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis from 2004 to 2023
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As a systemic metabolic disease, type 2 diabetes has gradually become a disease that seriously threatens human health and quality of life worldwide. Many studies have shown that its pathogenesis and treatment are closely related to intestinal cells. However, the research in this field lacks relevant bibliometric analysis. This study aims to review the knowledge structure and research hot spots on intestinal cells and type 2 diabetes and provide a new direction for its future research through bibliometric methods and visual knowledge maps. METHODS: Using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database, we searched the related literature on intestinal cells and type 2 diabetes from 2004 to 2023, and made bibliometric analysis through VOSviewer, CiteSpace, the "Bibliometrix" R package, and Scimago Graphica. Combined with Bradford's Law, Price's Law, Lotka's Law, and Zipf's law, bibliometrics analysis was conducted on publication time, author, country/region, keywords, journals, and references related to publications in this field. RESULTS: A total of 394 articles were included from 51 countries, led by the United States and China. In the past 20 years, the publication of relevant literature has shown a steady growth trend. These articles are from 2486 authors. Among them, Ti-dong Shan and Tao Yu from China have published the most literature, the University of Toronto is the main research institution, the Journal of Biological Chemistry is the journal with the most common citations, and the most prominently cited article is Sugar absorption in the industry: the role of GLUT2. CONCLUSION: This study is the first bibliometric analysis that comprehensively summarizes the research trends and hot spots of intestinal cells and type 2 diabetes. This information determines the research hot spots and research frontiers in this field. The hot spots of research are "intestinal epithelial cells", "GLP-1", "SGLT-1", "GLUT2", and "intestinal endocrine cell", while "intestinal epithelial stem cells", "short-chain fatty acid", "bile acid" and "bariatric surgery" may be the focus of future research, which helps clinicians better understand the relationship between intestinal cells and type 2 diabetes, and provides a reference direction for future scholars in this field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.036 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".