MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409212766 · doi:10.1111/php.14088

Cutaneous photosensitivity of phototheranostic porphyrin–lipid nanoparticles

2025· article· en· W4409212766 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael S. Valic, Mark Zheng, Theo Husby, Keegan Guidolin, Axel Sahovaler, Sharon Tzelnick, Wenlei Jiang, Michael Halim, Pamela Schimmer, Abdullah El‐Sayes, Chris J. Zhang, Tina Ye, Ivan Kosik, Jason L. Townson, Kenneth K. Ng, Lili Ding, Juan Chen, Jonathan C. Irish, Robert Weersink, Brian C. Wilson, Gang Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotochemistry and Photobiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersTerry Fox Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoCanada Research ChairsPrincess Margaret Cancer Foundation
KeywordsPhotosensitivityErythemaPhotosensitizerPhotodynamic therapyDermatologyNanocarriersMedicineDrugPhototoxicityPhotodermatosisChemistryPharmacologyPhotochemistryMaterials scienceBiochemistryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skin photosensitization is a common challenge following intravenous administration of many photodynamic therapy (PDT) drugs, typically lasting days, weeks, or months in laboratory animals and patients. Symptoms of photosensitivity manifest as erythema and edema on skin exposed to sunlight or bright artificial lighting. Recent efforts using nanocarriers to increase photosensitizer accumulation in tumors have also been shown to reduce skin photosensitivity. We previously developed phototheranostic PORPHYSOME (PS) nanoparticles self-assembled from porphyrin-lipid conjugates and capable of potent anti-tumor PDT. Here, we demonstrate in a nonpigmented rat skin model that PS exhibit less severe and shorter-lasting skin photosensitivity compared with an equivalent drug dose of porfimer sodium (PHO), the canonical first-generation PDT drug. At 2, 4, 8, and 12 days post intravenous injection, depilated skin was exposed to escalating doses of simulated solar light. Light exposure 4 days post-injection showed markedly reduced symptoms of skin photosensitivity with PS than PHO. By Day 8, the minimal dose of light eliciting any kind of skin reaction was significantly higher with PS than PHO, and by Day 12, there was no detectable skin response with PS. These differences were attributed to altered intradermal distribution and faster clearance of PS vs. PHO in rat skin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.852

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotochemistry and PhotobiologySame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207