Thoracic mobility in school-aged asthmatic children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Asthma is a chronic respiratory condition frequently observed in childhood, which can have detrimental effects on breathing and thoracic mobility. Objective To describe the thoracic mobility of 6- to 11-year-old children diagnosed with asthma and compare it with that of non-asthmatic children in schools in Cali, Colombia. Materials and methods This cross-sectional analytical study used a non-probabilistic convenience sampling technique to assess thoracic mobility. Data were analyzed using STATA 14® statistical software. Measurement of thoracic mobility was performed using cirtometry at the axillary (CAx) and xiphoid (CX) levels according to the protocol established by Bockenhauer et al. Asthma prevalence, history, symptoms, and associated risk factors were assessed using the self-administered International Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire. In addition, anthropometric measurements were collected to account for potential confounding variables. Results Of the 282 children enrolled, 193 met the inclusion criteria, and 11.9% were diagnosed with asthma. The asthmatic group exhibited several identified risk factors, including exposure to dust (47.8%), environmental fumes (30.4%), tobacco smoke (13%), and colds (47.8%). There were no statistically significant differences in anthropometric variables between the two groups. However, the asthmatic group showed significantly reduced thoracic mobility compared to the non-asthmatic group, especially in the CAx measurement (5.82 cm ± 2 for the non-asthmatic group vs. 5.18 cm ± 1.2 for the asthmatic group; p = 0.047). Conclusions Individuals diagnosed with asthma have reduced thoracic mobility compared to those without the condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".