Predicting postoperative complications after pneumonectomy using machine learning: a 10-year study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reducing postoperative cardiovascular and neurological complications (PCNC) during thoracic surgery is the key to improving postoperative survival. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate independent predictors of PCNC, develop machine learning models, and construct a predictive nomogram for PCNC in patients undergoing thoracic surgery for lung cancer. METHODS: This study used data from a previous retrospective study of 16,368 patients with lung cancer (training set: 11,458; validation set: 4,910) with American Standards Association physical statuses I-IV who underwent surgery. Postoperative information was collected from electronic medical records to help build models based on cause-and-effect and statistical data, potentially revealing hidden dependencies between factors and diseases in a big data environment. The optimal model was analyzed and filtered using multiple machine-learning models (Logistic regression, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Random forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine and Naïve Bayes). A predictive nomogram was built and receiver operating characteristics were used to assess the validity of the model. The discriminative power and clinical validity were assessed using calibration and decision-making curve analyses. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, surgery duration, intraoperative intercostal nerve block, postoperative patient-controlled analgesia, bronchial blocker use and sufentanil use were independent predictors of PCNC. Random forest was identified as the optimal model with an area under the curve of 0.898 in the training set and 0.752 in the validation set, confirming the excellent prediction accuracy of the nomogram. All the net benefits of the five machine-learning models in the training and validation sets demonstrated excellent clinical applicability, and the calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and observed risks. CONCLUSION: The combination of machine-learning models and nomograms may contribute to the early prediction and reduction in the incidence of PCNC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".