MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409223536 · doi:10.1002/aenm.202500957

Multifunctional Polyol Electrolyte Design toward Long Lifespan Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Batteries

2025· article· en· W4409223536 on OpenAlexaff
Xintao Long, Qianyi Ma, Yuying Li, Hongwei Bi, Mingjun Huang, Shuqi Dai, Jingxuan Ren, Xin Wang, Dan Luo, Zhongwei Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Energy Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceSuzhou Institute of Nanotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsPolyolMaterials scienceElectrolyteZincAqueous solutionIonNanotechnologyChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryMetallurgyElectrodeComposite materialPhysical chemistryChemistryEngineeringPolyurethane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aqueous zinc batteries have garnered significant attention due to their inherent safety and low cost. However, its large‐scale application is still hindered by critical challenges such as interfacial corrosion, hydrogen evolution reactions, and the formation of by‐products. To address these issues, this study introduces polyol (2‐hydroxymethyl‐1,3‐propylene glycol)(2H13P) in ZnSO 4 electrolyte as solvation structure regulator, which not only regulates the Zn 2+ solvation structure to achieve rapid desolvation kinetics but also promotes the in situ formation of a dense zincophilic organic layer, effectively isolating the side reaction occurred on Zn anode. Consequently, the Zn‐based battery demonstrates exceptional reversibility, maintains a remarkably high CE of 99.7% after 700 cycles. Furthermore, the Zn||Zn symmetric cell achieves an impressive cycle life of 4700 h at a current density of 1 mA cm −2 and maintains stability for over 400 h with high depth of discharge of 42.47%. In addition, the 2H13P can effectively suppress polyiodide ion shuttling in Zn‐I 2 battery, enabling remarkable capacity retention of 96.0% over 12 000 cycles at 10 C and 94.5% over 48 000 cycles at 25 C. Additionally, the pouch cell demonstrates a decent lifespan of 300 cycles at 1 C, highlighting its unlimited potential for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Energy MaterialsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207