MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409229200 · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkaf075

The genome of the MZM-0403 strain of the African turquoise killifish, <i>Nothobranchius furzeri</i>

2025· article· en· W4409229200 on OpenAlexaff
Bernadette D. Johnson, Balan Ramesh, Adam G. Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueG3 Genes Genomes Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish biology, ecology, and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of Idaho
KeywordsKillifishBiologyGenomeEvolutionary biologyGenome sizeWhole genome sequencingGeneticsGenomicsComparative genomicsGeneFish <Actinopterygii>Fishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The African turquoise killifish, Nothobranchius furzeri, is an emerging model for functional genomics research. Interest in N. furzeri stems from its extremely short lifespan, and the breadth of research on this fish is rapidly expanding. All currently available whole-genome assemblies for N. furzeri are based on the GRZ strain. However, N. furzeri shows substantial phenotypic differences among populations. Here, we present a whole-genome assembly of the MZM-0403 strain of N. furzeri, which differs from the GRZ strain with respect to lifespan and male coloration patterns. We used PacBio HiFi sequencing to sequence the genome of an MZM-0403 male to ∼48 × coverage. The PacBio reads were de novo assembled and then scaffolded against an existing N. furzeri genome assembly. This strategy resulted in a chromosome-level assembly. Our MZM-0403 assembly differs from previous N. furzeri assemblies in that it is closer to the expected genome size based on independent estimates (∼1.5 Gb) and it has substantially fewer gaps, particularly in the vicinity of genes and within introns. A repeat analysis shows that about two-thirds of the genome is composed of repetitive elements. In addition, our assembly approach allowed us to recover phased fragments of the X- and Y-chromosomes. Analysis of these regions identifies 20 genes that are likely in the nonrecombining region of the sex chromosomes. Overall, this novel genome assembly will be useful for future functional and comparative genomics studies of fishes in the genus Nothobranchius.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueG3 Genes Genomes GeneticsSame topicFish biology, ecology, and behaviorFrench-language works237,207