MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409246249 · doi:10.1130/g53168.1

Greenlandic debris in Iceland likely tied to Bond event 1 ice rafting in the Dark Ages

2025· article· en· W4409246249 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Spencer, Thomas Gernon, Ross N. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCurtin University of Technology
KeywordsGeologyDebrisEvent (particle physics)SeismologyOceanographyAstrophysicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the discovery of exotic igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary cobbles in raised beach deposits near Breiðavík, northern Iceland. These deposits consist of alternating cobble-, sand-, and silt-dominated facies. A nearby package of sands and silts, dated to the Late Antique Little Ice Age (LALIA; ca. 536–660 CE), provides age constraints for the raised terraces. While the upper terraces are composed exclusively of local basaltic material, the lowermost terraces (~2 m above high tide) contain a mix of basaltic and nonbasaltic cobbles, including quartzofeldspathic gneiss, granitoid, rhyolite, sandstone, and serpentinite. U-Pb geochronologic analysis of zircon revealed dominant age modes of ca. 2800, 1150, 500, and 240 Ma with Lu-Hf isotopic compositions suggesting derivation from Greenland’s North Atlantic craton and Caledonian fold belt. The colder conditions of the LALIA, coupled with increased iceberg calving from the Greenland ice sheet, would have led to enhanced ice-rafted debris (IRD) transport to disparate areas south and east of Greenland. The East Greenland and East Iceland currents transported this IRD from Greenland, with deposition occurring along the Icelandic coast as the icebergs melted. This IRD was likely transported across the North Atlantic during Bond event 1. This process, along with those during other transient cooling events, may explain the age discrepancies between local bedrock and detrital zircons in the Arctic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeologySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207