Dosing of interventions and interdisciplinary care in the rehabilitation process of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy in Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective. To compare the differences between the characteristics of rehabilitation processes (dosage and interdisciplinary care) and the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP) attending rehabilitation centers in Argentina. Population and methods. This is a cross-sectional study with sequential sampling. Children and adolescents aged 2 to 19 with CP from 15 rehabilitation centers were included. Questionnaires and information from medical records were used. The chi-square test with Fisher or Man-Whitney correction was used to compare the differences between the response variables (dose and interdisciplinary care) with age, severity, social security, type of institution, and socioeconomic level (SEL). A bivariate analysis with odds ratio was performed to measure the magnitude of the association. Results. A total of 267 participants were included. In terms of dose, the median was 3.5 hours of therapy per week. Children of lower-middle SEL, without social security, and attending public institutions received fewer hours of therapy. No differences were found in the number of hours according to age and severity level; regarding the number of disciplines, in most children older than 11 years fewer disciplines were involved in the therapeutic process. Conclusion. Statistically significant differences in dosing and interdisciplinary care were found concerning age groups, SES, access to social security, and type of institution attended, but not with the level of motor impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".