MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409247388 · doi:10.1159/000545624

Clinical Response to Cat Allergen in a Mobile Compared to a Fixed Naturalistic Exposure Chamber <sup>™</sup>

2025· article· en· W4409247388 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Haya, Suzanne Kelly, Stefan Van de Mosselaer, Rachel Friedrich, Jimmy Yang, William H. Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAllergenAerosolizationProvocation testSpirometryHouse dust miteInternal medicineImmunologyAnesthesiaInhalationAllergyAsthmaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Red Maple Trials Naturalistic Exposure Chamber™ (NEC™) is a fixed, live-cat exposure chamber, wherein allergen shed from two resident cats is aerosolized using a modified robot vacuum. The EnviroMini™ is a portable allergen exposure tent, in which allergen (Fel d 1, primarily) from milled cat hair is aerosolized in a similar manner. This is a single-center validation study designed to compare the allergic response to cat antigen provocation in the EnviroMini to the response in the previously validated NEC. Methods: Eight cat allergic subjects were randomized to undergo sequential 2-h allergen challenges in the EnviroMini and the NEC, 28 or more days apart. A modified robot vacuum aerosolized cat allergen in both chambers. Airborne Fel d 1 was measured using ELISA. Nasal, ocular, and chest symptoms were recorded every 10 min and spirometry every 20 min. Challenges were stopped and not repeated if FEV1 fell >20% of baseline during the exposure. Results: Fifteen subjects completed at least one challenge, and eight completed both (“per-protocol”). Mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) averaged over the last 30 min (“plateau”) was not significantly different between the EnviroMini and NEC (paired t test, p = 0.16; mean [SE] 6.1 [1.2] and 4.5 [0.6], EnviroMini and NEC, respectively). There was no difference in FEV1 change between the two challenges (p = 0.90). The same results were found for all subjects as for the per-protocol group. TNSS plateau was not correlated with Fel d 1 exposure, and there was no difference in average Fel d 1 concentrations between the chambers (EnviroMini: 55; NEC: 54 ng/m3). Conclusion: The EnviroMini offers comparable cat allergen exposure and nasal and respiratory responses to the NEC. Its portability facilitates expansion to multisite chamber studies for clinical validation of allergy therapies. Future work could expand its capabilities to other aeroallergens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and ImmunologySame topicAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFrench-language works237,207