MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409249451 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318636

The Lived Fracture Experience (LiFE) study: A mixed methods qualitative study research protocol exploring the lived experiences of fracture non-union patients

2025· article· en· W4409249451 on OpenAlexaff
Irene Yang, Carol Porteous, Hamish Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsVictoria HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersUniversity of Edinburgh
KeywordsResearch ethicsMedicineQualitative researchProtocol (science)Informed consentHealth careTelephone interviewQuality of life (healthcare)Family medicineNursingPsychiatryAlternative medicineLawSocial scienceSociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Fractures are a common and a major cause of disability and death, with up to 10% of fractures failing to heal normally. These fractures are called "fracture non-unions". Currently, debate on the impact of non-union in the medical and research communities exists. Unfortunately, this indirectly minimizes the impact of fracture non-unions, and hinders further research work which could reduce unnecessary patient suffering. In this study, we aim to explore the lived experiences of fracture non-union patients in one-on-one interviews to determine whether fracture non-union is a burden for patients, and if so, to outline the burden on patients and their close circles. METHODS: Eligible participants will include adult patients who currently have/previously (in the last 36 months) had a long bone fracture that has not healed normally. Data will be collected through in-depth face-to-face or telephone interviews, complemented by quantitative data captured using the standardized Euroqol EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. With consent, interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Using NVIVO software, we will develop grouped codes and categories to describe and provide insight into the experience of fracture non-union patients. EQ-5D-5L, and EQ VAS data will be presented using a measure of central tendency and a measure of dispersion to provide insight into the overall health related quality of life for patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales Approval (approval date: 27 March 2024; IRAS project ID: 337652). Results from this study aim to improve the information and support provided to fracture non-union patients. Findings will be disseminated to the study participants, healthcare professionals, and local commissioners through peer-reviewed articles and at academic conferences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.246
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207