MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409256630 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95621-7

Intrusion detection system based on machine learning using least square support vector machine

2025· article· en· W4409256630 on OpenAlexaff
Pratik Waghmode, Manideep Kanumuri, Hosam El‐Ocla, Tanner Boyle

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineComputer scienceMachine learningIntrusion detection systemArtificial intelligenceStructured support vector machineData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Security solutions in the cyber world are essential for enforcing protection against network vulnerabilities and data exploitation. Unauthorized access or attack can be avoided in critical systems using a comprehensive approach via an effective intrusion detection system (IDS). Traditional intrusion detection techniques are no longer accurate and effective enough to handle the demands of the big data age. Machine learning (ML) methods can be utilized for intrusion detection since the classifier's performance has significantly increased over the past decade. A significant limitation of most ML-based IDSs is that they often generate alerts for false predictions. This is owing to misclassifications that tend to occur more frequently than actual threats. Despite their effectiveness, these conventional ML-based IDSs often face difficulties scaling to meet the demands of big data. The increasing volume and complexity of datasets pose various challenges, such as high dimensionality, multiple data sources, and the need for a dependable infrastructure. Consequently, the accuracy of an ML model likely declines when irrelevant features are included from a vast dataset. In this paper, the exhaustive feature selection algorithm is employed to assess every possible combination of features in a dataset to evaluate its performance. The selection is based on identifying the feature subset with the highest accuracy. Hence, an ML-based complete security solution is introduced for network intrusion detection using the supervised framework. This framework utilizes quantum-inspired least square support vector machine (LS-SVM) classifier. This algorithm is used to enhance the classification accuracy in terms of reducing false predictions while minimizing the training time. The hyperparameters of our model are tuned by utilizing those selected features to maximize the accuracy. The model developed is verified using three different datasets, which have been widely applied to intrusion detection. The model achieves high detection performance, with accuracy values of 99.3% for NSL-KDD, 99.5% for CIC-IDS-2017, and 93.3% for UNSW-NB15. Precision remains at 1.00 for CIC-IDS-2017 and UNSW-NB15, while recall reaches 1.00 for CIC-IDS-2017, 0.99 for NSL-KDD, and 0.98 for UNSW-NB15. F1-scores follow the same trend, reflecting the classifier's robust prediction capabilities. In addition, our model demonstrates competitive testing time efficiency in 2.8 s for NSL-KDD, 1.0s for CIC-IDS-2017, and 2.8s for UNSW-NB15. Also, our model requires the minimum training time for all datasets compared to other models. These results highlight the LS-SVM-based model's suitability for real-time intrusion detection applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207