Wearable-Enhanced mHealth Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in Manual Wheelchair Users: Single-Group Pre-Post Feasibility Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: With the rapid advancement of technology, using wearable devices and mobile health (mHealth) apps to monitor and promote physical activity (PA) has become increasingly popular among individuals with various chronic conditions. However, such work remains limited among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), especially those who use a manual wheelchair for mobility. objectives: The study aims to describe the development of the WheelFit mHealth app for monitoring and promoting PA in manual wheelchair users (MWUs) with SCI and evaluate its feasibility and usability in free-living conditions. Methods: The WheelFit app, based on the Fogg Behavioral Model with inputs from stakeholders, including MWUs, physical therapists, and personal trainers, was developed to promote PA in MWUs. It works with two commercial wearable devices, that is, an Android smartwatch and a wheel sensor, which stream users' upper extremity and wheelchair movement to the app to calculate PA variables using custom algorithms. Users can set personal goals, review daily progress and PA history, and access an adaptive workout library within the app. A 4-week single-group pre-post study, consisting of a 1-week baseline and 3-week intervention phase, was conducted to evaluate WheelFit's feasibility and usability. Feasibility was evaluated using the session attendance rate, device and app usage, and implementation of action plans. Usability was assessed using the system usability scale. The preliminary effectiveness was assessed by comparing preintervention and postintervention PA variables and scores from the SCI exercise self-efficacy scale. Results: A total of 16 participants completed the study protocol with 100% session attendance and maintained 14.2 hours of daily device and app connection. Participants demonstrated varying levels of adherence to their action plans. The excellent usability of WheelFit was indicated by an average system usability scale score of 81.8 (SD 19.2) points. Statistically significant increases between pre-post daily exercise times (preintervention: mean 26.4, SD 16.9 minutes; postintervention: mean 33.3, SD 24.9 minutes; P=.049) and exercise self-efficacy scale scores (preintervention: mean 33.9, SD 4.5 points; postintervention: mean 35.9, SD 3.2 points; P=.043) were observed. Conclusions: The WheelFit app demonstrated promising feasibility, usability, and a positive impact on promoting PA in MWUs with SCI. Future investigation exploring the potential integration of the WheelFit app into clinical practice is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".