MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409261295 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2025.3558773

Versatile Optoelectronic Oscillator for Single-Frequency, Dual-Frequency, and Mode-Locking Oscillation

2025· article· en· W4409261295 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhuoran Wang, Yuxuan Xie, Zixian Wei, David V. Plant, Lawrence R. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOptoelectronicsOscillation (cell signaling)Single-mode optical fiberAutomatic frequency controlFrequency modulationMaterials scienceOpticsFrequency synthesizerPhase noiseFrequency driftVoltage-controlled oscillatorInjection lockingPhysicsLocal oscillatorRadio frequencyOptical fiberLaserElectrical engineeringComputer scienceTelecommunicationsPhase-locked loopEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate a versatile optoelectronic oscillator (OEO) that can seamlessly switch between single-frequency, dual-frequency, and mode-locking oscillation modes. The OEO operates by shaping the spectrum of an ASE (Amplified Spontaneous Emission) source into a cosine profile to generate multiple taps that create a microwave photonic (MWP) finite impulse response (FIR) filter through fiber dispersion. By programming the spectrum of the ASE source, we can produce multiple independent RF passbands with wide frequency tunability. Consequently, our OEO exhibits a broad frequency tuning range from 3.05 GHz to 11.12 GHz for both single-frequency and mode-locking oscillation modes. In the dual-frequency mode, the two microwave signals can be independently adjusted, covering ranges of 3.05 GHz to 3.96 GHz and 6.29 GHz to 7.41 GHz, respectively. Furthermore, our OEO shows excellent frequency stability with frequency drifts remaining below 0.2 kHz over 5 minutes in mode-locking mode without the need for any frequency stabilization. Finally, the entire structure is composed of a single cavity, making our OEO both cost-effective and compact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207