Wave overtopping characteristics of a non-perforated and seaside perforated quarter-circle breakwater
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A breakwater is a structure used to dissipate the wave energy in order to protect the shore and maintain tranquility inside the harbor basin. The quarter-circle breakwater (QBW) constitutes of a quarter circular front wall facing incident waves, a vertical rear wall, and a horizontal base slab placed on a rubble mound foundation. In this study, a comprehensive experimental investigation is carried out in order to examine the wave overtopping characteristics of a non-perforated and seaside perforated emerged quarter-circle breakwater subjected to regular waves. A model scale of 1:30 is selected based on the limitations of testing facilities. For the current investigation, QBW models of the radius 0.50 m are utilized. The model is tested for six different perforations ranging between 0% and 20%, with a constant perforation radius of 0.016 m. The paper highlights the influence of wave steepness (Hi/gT2), relative crest freeboard (Rc/Hi), relative water depth (d/gT2) on the wave overtopping performance of the seaside perforated and non-perforated QBW models. An increase in wave steepness is found to increase the dimensionless mean wave overtopping discharge. Also, an exponential decrease in dimensionless mean wave overtopping discharge is observed with an increasing relative freeboard. The relative freeboard is found to be one of the predominant parameters influencing the wave overtopping discharge rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".