MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409274019 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202562303001

Balancing electricity and integrating renewable energy facilities into the Unified Energy System of Kazakhstan: Challenges and opportunities

2025· article· en· W4409274019 on OpenAlexaff
Sergey Bespalyy, Yelena Bespalaya

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyElectricity systemElectricityEnergy systemEnvironmental economicsBusinessEnvironmental scienceElectricity generationEngineeringEconomicsElectrical engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the current issues of integration of renewable energy sources facilities into the Unified Energy System of Kazakhstan, problems and opportunities. Data on the installed capacity and power utilization coefficient of various types of renewable energy sources, such as wind power plants, solar power plants and small hydroelectric power plants, are presented. The problems of uneven generation of renewable energy, including significant seasonal fluctuations, are identified. The prospects for the development of renewable energy in Kazakhstan, including plans to increase capacity through auctions and the implementation of major projects, were considered. Special attention is paid to the tasks related to the balancing of electricity, the development of the national energy network and the introduction of energy storage systems. The importance of modern renewable energy forecasting and dispatching systems for improving the reliability of the country's energy system is also discussed. Based on the analysis, recommendations are proposed to improve the integration of renewable energy sources, which can contribute to the sustainable development of Kazakhstan's energy sector and ensure national energy security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207