MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409277330 · doi:10.30770/2572-1852-111.1.35

International Briefs

2025· article· en· W4409277330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Regulation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CanadaChanges to the TDM Examination in 2026The Medical Council of Canada (MCC) is pleased to announce the implementation of a new assessment model for the Therapeutics Decision-Making (TDM) Examination, planned for January 2026. Administered by the MCC on behalf of the Practice-Ready Assessment (PRA) programs, the TDM Examination is part of the selection process for qualified internationally trained physicians to enter most PRA programs.To enhance the candidate experience and increase the efficiency of the exam process, a new format will be implemented featuring multiple-choice questions and short-menu questions divided into two sections, and an optional 20-minute break between the sections will be offered. The MCC anticipates these changes will also allow for a faster release of results.The revised TDM Examination will maintain its integrity, validity and reliability, with the questions assessing the competence of candidates at the level required of a family physician practicing independently and safely in Canada.The exam will continue to be delivered globally through Prometric both at test centers and via remote proctoring.The MCC website will be updated with additional information as it becomes available.Further information is available at https://mcc.ca/news/changes-to-the-tdm-examination-in-2026/IndiaAdditional Medical Seats to Solve Doctor Shortage?In the Union Budget 2025, India's Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced the addition of 10,000 new medical seats across medical colleges and hospitals in the coming year to help address the nation's doctor shortage. This is part of a broader plan to increase India's medical education capacity by 75,000 seats over the next five years. However, regional disparities in doctor distribution, infrastructure challenges, and the retention of medical professionals in rural areas remain key hurdles to achieving healthcare equity across India.Further information is available at https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/will-indias-10000-new-medical-seats-solve-the-doctor-shortage-crisis/articleshow/117824316.cms

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5430.280

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.466 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical RegulationSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207