MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409290870 · doi:10.1681/asn.0000000680

Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential and Progression of CKD

2025· article· en· W4409290870 on OpenAlexaffabout
Caitlyn Vlasschaert, Yang Pan, Jianchun Chen, Elvis A. Akwo, Varun Rao, James E. Hixson, Michael Chong, Md Mesbah Uddin, Zhi Yu, Mengdi Jiang, Fenfen Peng, Shirong Cao, Y. Wang, Do-Kyun Kim, Adriana M. Hung, Jing He, Manjula Kurella Tamura, Debbie L. Cohen, Jiang He, Changwei Li, Zeenat Bhat, Panduranga S. Rao, Dawei Xie, Alexander G. Bick, Bryan Kestenbaum, Guillaume Paré, Michael J. Rauh, Adeera Levin, Pradeep Natarajan, James P. Lash, Ming‐Zhi Zhang, Raymond C. Harris, Cassianne Robinson‐Cohen, Matthew B. Lanktree, Tanika N. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research InstituteImpactThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Human Genome Research Institute
KeywordsHazard ratioMedicineKidney diseaseInternal medicineRenal functionDialysisOncologyPopulationCohortProportional hazards modelConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points Non- DNMT3A clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential was associated with CKD progression in a meta-analysis of 5654 individuals with CKD. In an adenine-induced CKD mouse model, Tet2 -clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential was linked to lower GFR, increased kidney inflammation, tubular injury, and fibrosis. Background Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is a common inflammatory condition of aging that causes myriad end-organ damage. CHIP has been associated with incident AKI and kidney function decline in the general population, particularly mutations in CHIP genes other than DNMT3A (termed non- DNMT3A CHIP). Previous studies of CHIP in individuals with CKD had limited sample sizes and conflicting findings. Methods We examined CHIP and CKD progression in four CKD cohorts ( N =5654): the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort, the African American Study of Kidney Disease, individuals with CKD from the BioVU biorepository, and the Canadian Study of Prediction of Death, Dialysis and Interim Cardiovascular Events. Primary outcomes were incident CKD progression (50% eGFR decline or kidney failure) and eGFR slope over time. In addition, kidney function and pathology were assessed in a Tet2 -CHIP mouse model of CKD induced by dietary adenine. Results Across all cohorts, the average age was 66±11 years, with an average baseline eGFR of 43±15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , and 24% had CHIP. After meta-analysis, non- DNMT3A CHIP was associated with a 64% higher relative risk of incident CKD progression (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 2.68), with the strongest effect observed in individuals with baseline eGFR 30–60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 2.90). Non- DNMT3A CHIP carriers also exhibited a faster eGFR decline ( β , −0.62±0.28 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year; P = 0.03). In a dietary adenine mouse model of CKD, Tet2 -CHIP was associated with lower GFR as well as greater kidney inflammation, tubular injury, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Conclusions Non- DNMT3A CHIP was associated with CKD progression among individuals with CKD. Furthermore, Tet2 -CHIP mouse models support a causal role in kidney injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.014
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207