Effects of Testosterone and Its Major Metabolites upon Different Stages of Neuron Survival in the Dentate Gyrus of Male Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Testosterone has been shown to enhance hippocampal neurogenesis through increased cell survival, but which stages of new neuron development are influenced by testosterone remains unclear. Therefore, we tested the effects of sex steroids administered during three different periods after cell division in the dentate gyrus of adult male rats to determine when they influence the survival of new neurons. Adult male rats were bilaterally castrated. After 7 days of recovery, a single injection of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was given on the first day of the experiment (Day 0) to label actively dividing cells. All subjects received five consecutive days of hormone injections during one of three stages of new neuron development (days 1-5, 6-10, or 11-15) after BrdU labeling. Subjects were injected during these time periods with either testosterone propionate (0.250 or 0.500 mg/rat), dihydrotestosterone (0.250 or 0.500 mg/rat), or estradiol benzoate (1.0 or 10 µg/rat). All subjects were euthanized sixteen days later to assess the effects of these hormones on the number of BrdU-labeled cells. The high dose of testosterone caused a significant increase in the number of BrdU-labeled cells in the hippocampus compared to all other groups, with the strongest effect caused by later injections (11-15 days old). In contrast, neither DHT nor estradiol injections had any significant effects on number of BrdU-labeled cells. Fluorescent double-labeling and confocal microscopy reveal that the majority of BrdU-labeled cells were neurons. Our results add to past evidence that testosterone increases neurogenesis, but whether this involves an androgenic or estrogenic pathway remains unclear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".