MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409293301 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012

DESI 2024 III: baryon acoustic oscillations from galaxies and quasars

2025· article· en· W4409293301 on OpenAlexaff
A. G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. P. Ahlen, Shadab Alam, D. M. Alexander, Marcelo A. Alvarez, O. Alves, Abhijeet Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, S. Àvila, Alejandro Avilés, Humna Awan, S. Bailey, C. Baltay, A. Bault, Jayashree Behera, S. BenZvi, Florian Beutler, D. Bianchi, Chris Blake, Robert Blum, S. Brieden, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, E. Burtin, R. Calderón, R. E. A. Canning, A. Carnero Rosell, R. Cereskaite, Jorge L. Cervantes–Cota, Solène Chabanier, E. Chaussidon, J. Chaves-Montero, Shi-Fan Chen, Xinyi Chen, T. Claybaugh, Shaun Cole, Andrei Cuceu, T. M. Davis, Kyle Dawson, Axel de la Macorra, Arnaud de Mattia, N. Deiosso, Arjun Dey, Biprateep Dey, Z. Ding, P. Doel, Jerry Edelstein, S. Eftekharzadeh, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Ann Elliott, Parker Fagrelius, K. Fanning, Simone Ferraro, J. Ereza, N. Findlay, B. Flaugher, Andreu Font-Ribera, D. Forero-Sánchez, J. E. Forero-Romero, C. García-Quintero, E. Gaztañaga, Héctor Gil-Marín, Satya Gontcho A Gontcho, Alma X. González‐Morales, Violeta González-Pérez, C. Gordon, D. Green, D. Gruen, Rafaela Gsponer, G. Gutierrez, J. Guy, Boryana Hadzhiyska, ChangHoon Hahn, M. Hanif, H. K. Herrera-Alcantar, K. Honscheid, Cullan Howlett, Dragan Huterer, Vid Iršič, Mustapha Ishak, S. Juneau, Naim Göksel Karaçaylı, R. Kehoe, S. Kent, D. Kirkby, Hui Kong, Anthony Kremin, Alex Krolewski, Ying‐Cheng Lai, Ting-Wen Lan, Martin Landriau, Dustin Lang, J. Lasker, J.M. Le Goff, L. Le Guillou, Alexie Leauthaud, M. E. Levi, Ting S. Li, Eric V. Linder, K. Lodha, C. Magneville, Marc Manera, Daniel Margala, Paul Martini, M. Maus, Patrick McDonald, L. Medina-Varela, Aaron Meisner, J. Mena-Fernández, R. Miquel, J. Moon, Shannon Moore, John Moustakas, Eva-Maria Mueller, A. Muñoz-Gutiérrez, Adam D. Myers, S. Nadathur, L. Napolitano, Richard Neveux, Jeffrey A. Newman, Nhat-Minh Nguyen, Jundan Nie, Gustavo Niz, H. E. Noriega, Nikhil Padmanabhan, E. Paillas, N. Palanque‐Delabrouille, Jiaming Pan, S. Penmetsa, Will J. Percival, Matthew M. Pieri, Mathilde Pinon, Claire Poppett, A. Porredon, Francisco Prada, A. Pérez-Fernández, Ignasi Pérez-Ràfols, D. Rabinowitz, Anand Raichoor, C. Ramírez-Pérez, S. Ramirez-Solano, M. Rashkovetskyi, C. Ravoux, Mehdi Rezaie, J. Rich, A. Rocher, Constance M. Rockosi, Natalie A. Roe, A. Rosado-Marin, Ashley J. Ross, Graziano Rossi, Rossana Ruggeri, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, Lado Samushia, E. Sánchez, Christoph Saulder, Edward F. Schlafly, David J. Schlegel, M. Schubnell, Hee‐Jong Seo, R. M. Sharples, J. Silber, A. Slosar, A. G. Smith, D. Sprayberry, J. Swanson, T. Tan, G. Tarlé, S. Trusov, R. Vaisakh, D. Valcin, F. Valdés, M. Vargas-Magaña, Licia Verde, Michael Walther, Ben Wang, M. S. Wang, B. A. Weaver, N. Weaverdyck, Risa H. Wechsler, David H. Weinberg, Martin White, Michael Wilson, Jiaxi Yu, Yu Yu, Sihan Yuan, Christophe Yèche, E.A. Zaborowski, Pauline Zarrouk, Hanyu Zhang, Cheng Zhao, Ruiyang Zhao, Rongpu Zhou, Hu Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuasarBaryon acoustic oscillationsAstrophysicsGalaxyBaryonAstronomyRedshift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the DESI 2024 galaxy and quasar baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) measurements using over 5.7 million unique galaxy and quasar redshifts in the range 0.1 < z < 2.1. Divided by tracer type, we utilize 300,017 galaxies from the magnitude-limited Bright Galaxy Survey with 0.1 < z < 0.4, 2,138,600 Luminous Red Galaxies with 0.4 < z < 1.1, 2,432,022 Emission Line Galaxies with 0.8 < z < 1.6, and 856,652 quasars with 0.8 < z < 2.1, over a ∼ 7,500 square degree footprint. The analysis was blinded at the catalog-level to avoid confirmation bias. All fiducial choices of the BAO fitting and reconstruction methodology, as well as the size of the systematic errors, were determined on the basis of the tests with mock catalogs and the blinded data catalogs. We present several improvements to the BAO analysis pipeline, including enhancing the BAO fitting and reconstruction methods in a more physically-motivated direction, and also present results using combinations of tracers. We employ a unified BAO analysis method across all tracers. We present a re-analysis of SDSS BOSS and eBOSS results applying the improved DESI methodology and find scatter consistent with the level of the quoted SDSS theoretical systematic uncertainties. With the total effective survey volume of ∼ 18 Gpc 3 , the combined precision of the BAO measurements across the six different redshift bins is ∼0.52%, marking a 1.2-fold improvement over the previous state-of-the-art results using only first-year data. We detect the BAO in all of these six redshift bins. The highest significance of BAO detection is 9.1σ at the effective redshift of 0.93, with a constraint of 0.86% placed on the BAO scale. We find that our observed BAO scales are systematically larger than the prediction of the Planck 2018-ΛCDM at z < 0.8. We translate the results into transverse comoving distance and radial Hubble distance measurements, which are used to constrain cosmological models in our companion paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations242
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207