MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409308523 · doi:10.1002/acn3.70031

Clinical Phenotyping of Long <scp>COVID</scp> Patients Evaluated in a Specialized Neuro‐<scp>COVID</scp> Clinic

2025· article· en· W4409308523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luana D. Yamashita, Neel Desai, Abigail R. Manning, Caitlin Pileggi, Sara Manning Peskin, Danielle K. Sandsmark, Dennis L. Kolson, Matthew K. Schindler

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsMedicineNeurocognitiveCognitive testCognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceNeurological examinationPediatricsInternal medicinePhysical therapyPsychiatryCognitive impairment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To report Long COVID characteristics and longitudinal courses of patients evaluated between 4/14/21-4/14/22 at the University of Pennsylvania Neurological COVID Clinic (PNCC), including clinical symptoms, neurological examination findings, and neurocognitive screening tests from a standardized PNCC neurological evaluation approach. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal study in a single-center tertiary care academic center. Participants include 240 patients with documented evidence of a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR or antibody test who underwent initial evaluation and 182 patients with longitudinal follow-up. Main outcomes evaluated are patient demographics, duration of illness prior to self-reported improvement, and cognitive testing results-including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (version 8.2) (MoCA) and Oral Trail Making Test-B (OTMT-B). RESULTS: The majority (73%) of patients did not require hospitalization for their acute COVID-19 symptoms. Frequent Long COVID complaints included headache (60%), dizziness/vertigo (40%), and disturbance of taste/smell (40%). Almost all (94%) patients reported cognitive symptoms, and over 30% of patients had abnormal scores on cognitive testing. Severe infection, fewer years of education level, and non-White race were found to be statistically associated with an increased likelihood of having abnormal scores on cognitive testing. Neuroimaging and clinical laboratory testing were largely not informative for patient care. Sixty-two percent of patients with follow-up visits self-reported improvement in their primary neurological complaint within 1 year of evaluation. INTERPRETATION: Performance on standardized cognitive screening tests may not be consistent with frequently reported cognitive complaints in Long COVID patients. The most common clinical trajectory was self-reported improvement in the primary neurological symptom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Clinical and Translational NeurologySame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207