MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409310168 · doi:10.18060/28483

Executing a Social Media Advertising Campaign for a Community Sport Organization

2025· article· en· W4409310168 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael L. Naraine, Nicholas Burton

Bibliographic record

VenueSports Innovation Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingAdvertising campaignBusinessSocial mediaPublic relationsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social media advertising is an important part of digital media operations, but is relatively unknown in sport management and marketing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the execution of a social media advertising campaign (SMAC). Using an action research approach, the research team created and executed a SMAC on TikTok for a community sport organization in Canada. Over the course of the SMAC, there were a total of 199,166 impressions at a total cost of $520 CAD; the cost-per-click of $0.50 CAD and cost-per-mille of $2.70 CAD. While there were positive metrics, actual watch time of the content was quite low. Sport marketers should view this study as an important step in advancing social media operations and achieving key performance indicators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSports Innovation JournalSame topicDigital Marketing and Social MediaFrench-language works237,207