MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409310170 · doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.12.030

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement With the Novel System

2025· article· en· W4409310170 on OpenAlexaff
Xiangbin Pan, Fanglin Lu, Yiwei Wang, Yingqiang Guo, Mao Chen, Meng Xu, Haibo Zhang, Nianguo Dong, Xiaoke Shang, Jian Yang, Yang Liu, Jianan Wang, Xianbao Liu, Huiming Guo, Jian Liu, Fan Qiao, Guido Ascione, Anson Cheung, Thomas Modine, Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben, Juan F. Granada, Zhi-yun Xu, Shengshou Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTricuspid valveValve replacementCardiologyInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) is emerging as a promising surgical alternative for high-risk patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Nonetheless, the feasibility of more dedicated devices and the need for additional clinical evidence warrant further exploration. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to report the 1-year outcomes of the TRAVEL (Transcatheter Right Atrial-Ventricular Valve Replacement With LuX-Valve) study with the LuX-Valve system for patients with severe TR. METHODS: A total of 126 patients with symptomatic severe TR were prospectively enrolled in the single-arm, multicenter TRAVEL study from June 2020 to August 2021. All patients underwent TTVR via the transatrial approach using the LuX-Valve system. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure at 1-year follow-up. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were reported. RESULTS: At baseline, all enrolled patients (mean age 65.8 ± 7.5 years, 79.4% women) were at high surgical risk (mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 9.2% ± 4.4%), with severe or greater TR and NYHA functional class ≥ III. In 1-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 10.3%, and 4.0% of patients were hospitalized for heart failure. TR was reduced to mild or less in 95.2% (P < 0.001), with decreases in right atrial systolic volume (-38.3 ± 21.7 mL; P < 0.001) and mid right ventricular end-systolic diameter (-6.4 ± 2.3 mm; P < 0.001). NYHA functional class I or II was achieved in 79.8% (P < 0.001), and 6-minute walking distance increased by 71.3 ± 42.8 m (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year outcomes of the TRAVEL study showed a sustained reduction in TR among patients who underwent LuX-Valve TTVR, accompanied by significant right heart reverse remodeling and improved functional status. Favorable procedural success and survival benefits were also demonstrated. (the TRAVEL Trial: Transcatheter Right Atrial-Ventricular Valve Replacement With LuX-Valve; NCT04436653).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC: Cardiovascular InterventionsSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207