Mixture of Gradient: A Unified Enhancing Approach for Deep-Learning-Based Wireless Network Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning plays increasingly important role in future wireless network management and optimization. Existing training methods such as label-based supervised learning and label-free learning have inherent limitations. The performance of supervised learning is limited by labels, while label-free training methods require extensive exploration. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel mixture of gradients (MoG) method, which integrates gradients from different sources within the training process in order to improve the convergence performance of neural networks (NNs). Particularly, MoG is a modular, plug-and-play solution requiring no structural modifications to existing NNs. Its implementation necessitates only minor modifications to the loss function, where the label-based supervised loss is combined with a label-free loss through weighted summation. The label-free loss can be either unsupervised loss or reinforcement learning loss. This flexibility allows seamless integration into nearly all NN-based methods, making it applicable to a wide range of wireless optimization problems with minimal implementation cost. Extensive simulations across multiple classic wireless scenarios demonstrate that MoG can significantly enhance the performance of NN decision-making, leading to higher transmission rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".