Clinical and Immunologic Impact of CMV Coinfection Among Children Living With HIV in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has been well described among severely immunocompromised children living with HIV (CLWH), the impact of CMV coinfection, is not well understood. The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical and immunologic effects of CMV coinfection in CLWH in Canada. METHODS: This is a substudy of the Early Pediatric Initiation, Canada Child Cure Cohort study, which enrolled CLWH in Canada between 2014 and 2018. CMV serostatus was determined at the first (baseline) study visit, and HIV-1 viral load (VL), CMV VL, and lymphocyte subsets were quantified every 3-6 months. For a subset of participants, CD4 + and CD8 + T cell subsets were analyzed using flow cytometry. The clinical outcomes were recorded retrospectively at the baseline visit and prospectively during the study period. RESULTS: Of the 225 participants, 85.3% were CMV seropositive (CMV + ) and 81% had suppressed HIV VL. While there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between CMV + and CMV - children, CMV + children had lower frequencies of CD4 + T cells, higher frequencies of CD8 + T cells, and lower CD4/CD8 ratio at baseline than CMV - children. Children with CMV + children also demonstrated a higher frequency of CD4 + effector memory cells, lower CD8 + naïve T cells, and higher frequencies of CD8 + terminally differentiated effector memory cells. These differences remained significant even after adjusting for HIV viral control. CONCLUSIONS: CMV coinfection is common among CLWH and is associated with distinct immunological changes despite the effective control of HIV replication with antiretroviral therapy. The long-term implications of these immunologic perturbations require further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".