Genetic modulation of brain dynamics in neurodevelopmental disorders: the impact of copy number variations on resting-state EEG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research has shown that many copy number variations (CNVs) increase the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., autism, ADHD, schizophrenia). However, little is known about the effects of CNVs on brain development and function. Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) is a suitable method to study the disturbances of neuronal functioning in CNVs. We aimed to determine whether there are resting-state EEG signatures that are characteristic of children with pathogenic CNVs. EEG resting-state brain activity of 109 CNV carriers (66 deletion carriers, 43 duplication carriers) aged 3 to 17 years was recorded for 4 minutes. To better account for developmental variations, EEG indices (power spectral density and functional connectivity) were corrected with a normative model estimated from 256 Healthy Brain Network controls. Results showed a decreased exponent of the aperiodic activity and a reduced alpha peak frequency in CNV carriers. Additionally, the study showed altered periodic components and connectivity in several frequency bands. Deletion and duplication carriers exhibited a similar overall pattern of deviations in spectral and connectivity measures, although the significance and effect sizes relative to the control group varied across frequency bands. Deletion and duplication carriers can be differentiated by their periodic power in the gamma band and connectivity in the low alpha band, with duplication carriers showing more disrupted alterations than deletion carriers. The distinctive alterations in spectral patterns were found to be most prominent during adolescence. The results suggest that CNV carriers show electrophysiological alterations compared to neurotypical controls, regardless of the gene dosage effect and their affected genomic region. At the same time, while duplications and deletions share common electrophysiological alterations, each exhibits distinct brain alteration signatures that reflect gene dosage-specific effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".