MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409322788 · doi:10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102848

Oral anticoagulant periprocedural management in patients undergoing an oral, dental implant or periodontal surgery: a prospective national observational survey

2025· article· en· W4409322788 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Isabelle Mahé, David Hajage, Virginie Monnet‐Corti, Louis Maman, Vianney Descroix, Yann De Rycke, Loredana Radoï

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisSociété Française de Parodontologie et d'Implantologie OraleDaiichi-SankyoDaiichi Sankyo EuropeBristol-Myers SquibbBamfield Marine Sciences Centre
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyDentistryPeriodontal surgeryOral surgeryDental implantImplantSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Oral surgery is a frequent invasive procedure in patients on oral anticoagulants. In usual care, the periprocedural management of these patients is questioned, with conflicting guidelines for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Objectives To assess the risk of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events during the periprocedural period (5 days before and 30 days after the oral invasive procedure). Methods The PRatiques Anticoagulants oraux DIrects Chirurgie Orale Study (NCT 03150303) is a prospective noninterventional national study including patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulants (duration of treatment of at least 1 month) and referred to dental surgeons for an invasive procedure. Hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events and death on days 2, 7, and 30 were reported and analyzed according to anticoagulant management (interruption/continuation). Bleedings were classified according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis classification after blinded review. Results Overall, between July 2017 and December 2019, 523 patients (mean age 74) were recruited (345 on DOACs and 178 on vitamin K antagonists [VKAs]). During the periprocedural period, 62 events (11.8 events per 100 person-month [PM]) occurred, all local bleedings, in 50 patients (90.3% during the 7 days). The incidence of postoperative bleeding was greater in patients who continued on DOACs compared with patients who continued on VKAs (15.9/100 PM vs 5.9/100 PM; P = .003). Conversely, no significant difference was observed between patients with DOAC discontinuation and patients with VKA continuation (6.2/100 PM vs 5.9/100 PM; P = .75). Conclusion In patients on anticoagulants undergoing an invasive oral procedure, the risk of bleeding occurs mainly within the 7 days following the procedure. Our data suggest the benefit of short perioperative discontinuation of DOACs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.440
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.074 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and HaemostasisSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207