MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409327455 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2025.3559870

A High-Frequency Ultrasound Endoscope for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery

2025· article· en· W4409327455 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Nicole MacMullin, Theresa Gu, Thomas Landry, Nicholas Campbell, Sean Christie, Jeremy A. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health Authority
FundersNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsEndoscopeHigh frequency ultrasoundUltrasoundInvasive surgeryAcousticsBiomedical engineeringRadiologyMedicineEngineeringComputer scienceSurgeryMedical physicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transition to minimally invasive spinal surgery over traditional open procedures requires the development of imaging techniques that meet the size constraints. Due to size restrictions associated with minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), current imaging techniques are largely limited to microscopy, which is only capable of line-of-sight imaging of the tissue surface. A miniature, high-resolution ultrasound imaging endoscope has been developed as a potential alternative imaging method that would enable intraoperative guidance. We have designed and developed a 30-MHz miniature, 64-element high-resolution imaging endoscope using PIN-PMT-PT single crystal as the piezoelectric substrate. The packaged probe had cross-sectional dimensions of $3.8\times 4.2$ mm and a length of 14 cm. Two editions of the endoscope were created with a forward facing and 40° angle to enable visualization of structures during a medial and lateral approach, respectively. The probe was combined with a custom imaging system that produced real-time images with a field of view ranging between ±32° and an image depth of 15 mm. The two-way axial resolution was measured to be $38~\mu $ m based on the -6-dB width of the pulse envelope. The -6-dB lateral resolution was measured to be 113, 131, and $158~\mu $ m at steering angles of 0°, 12°, and 25°, respectively, which were close to the simulated values of 106, 118, and $144~\mu $ m. Preliminary clinical imaging studies successfully demonstrated the visualization of pertinent spinal anatomy during minimally invasive surgeries. The imaging probe was also able to demonstrate compression and decompression of nerve roots, supporting its potential use as a clinical tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207