MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409327552 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3559676

Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning-Based Multiple Access for Dynamic Wireless Networks

2025· article· en· W4409327552 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenyu Chen, Xinghua Sun, Yili Jin, Fangxin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningTask (project management)WirelessWireless networkComputer networkDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of emergent applications, wireless networks require the provision of high throughput. Meanwhile, wireless scenarios exhibit highly dynamic characteristics, involving frequent changes in the network scale and traffic. To satisfy the high demand for new applications in dynamic wireless scenarios, a novel medium access control (MAC) protocol is required to allow stations to access the channel with high efficiency and adaptability. Based on multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), we propose a new MAC protocol, Multi-task Transformer-based Multiple Access (MTMA). Multi-task learning is applied to train a single actor to adapt to multiple wireless environments simultaneously. To improve the scalability, we propose a transformer-based critic network, which can scale to different wireless scenarios. Moreover, a novel network called “Generalization for N (Gen-N)” network is proposed to enhance the generalization ability. We conduct simulation experiments to demonstrate that MTMA: 1) achieves over 95% of upper bound of throughput while maximizing the fairness performance; 2) outperforms classic MAC protocol and MARL-based baselines in scenarios with saturated and light traffic; 3) can adapt to environmental changes quickly in dynamic scenarios; 4) can generalize to unseen scenarios during training. Finally, the ablation experiments are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of components used in MTMA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207