MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neonatal Sucrose and Internalizing Behaviors at 18 Months in Children Born Very Preterm

2025· article· en· W4409329685 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mia A. McLean, Manon Ranger, Jeffrey N. Bone, Thiviya Selvanathan, Stephanie H. Au‐Young, Cecil M. Y. Chau, Vann Chau, Linh Ly, Edmond Kelly, Anne Synnes, Steven P. Miller, Ruth E. Grunau

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Network Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalBC Children's HospitalUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsMedicineCBCLPediatricsGestational ageProspective cohort studyAnxietyNeonatal intensive care unitChild Behavior ChecklistCohortPregnancyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: In the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), neonates born very preterm (<33 weeks' gestation) are exposed to great numbers of painful procedures, which is associated with more internalizing (anxiety and depressive) behaviors later in childhood. Oral sucrose is commonly used in NICUs to treat acute procedural pain and is effective in reducing behavioral responses, but the long-term associations between oral sucrose and child behaviors have not yet been examined. Objective: To examine associations between cumulative neonatal pain and sucrose exposure in early life (prior to approximately 32 weeks postmenstrual age), in relation to child behaviors (internalizing and externalizing) at 18 months corrected age (CA) in children born very preterm and to examine whether the associations are sex specific. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a prospective, longitudinal cohort study, children born very preterm (24-32 weeks' gestational age [GA]) were recruited from 2015 to 2019 from 3 tertiary NICUs in Canada and attended a follow-up visit at 18 months CA. Data analysis was performed from February to May 2024. Exposures: The clinical protocol to treat acute procedural pain at site 1 was facilitated tucking with nonnutritive sucking; sites 2 and 3 used 24% sucrose with nonnutritive sucking. Prospective clinical record review was conducted (eg, number of painful procedures, cumulative sucrose dose, analgesia, sedation, days receiving mechanical ventilation, and surgical procedures). Main Outcomes and Measures: Parents reported on their child's behavior on the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; 1.5 to 5 years) yielding internalizing and externalizing scores. Results: In total, 192 children (110 male [57%]) were included in the current study. After applying propensity score weights to adjust for clinical factors across sucrose and nonsucrose sites and accounting for neonatal pain, cumulative sucrose (milliliters) in early life was not associated with internalizing scores (B = 0.62; 95% CI, -0.46 to 1.99). However, greater neonatal pain exposure was significantly associated with higher 18-month CBCL internalizing scores (B = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.0003 to 0.0135; R2 = 1.8%). There were no associations with externalizing scores, and associations were not moderated by child sex. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of children born very preterm across 3 tertiary NICUs in Canada, cumulative sucrose exposure in early life demonstrated no association with child behavior and did not ameliorate the association between greater neonatal pain and internalizing behaviors. Further research is needed to identify pain management strategies that can effectively mitigate or protect against adverse behavioral outcomes in children born very preterm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Network OpenSame topicPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207