MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409330169 · doi:10.5194/bg-22-1781-2025

Modelling decadal trends and the impact of extreme events on carbon fluxes in a temperate deciduous forest using a terrestrial biosphere model

2025· article· en· W4409330169 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tea Thum, Tuuli Miinalainen, Outi Seppälä, Holly Croft, Cheryl Rogers, Ralf M. Staebler, Silvia Caldararu, Sönke Zaehle

Bibliographic record

VenueBiogeosciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaToronto Metropolitan University
FundersOffice of ScienceAcademy of FinlandU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBiosphereTemperate deciduous forestDeciduousTemperate forestEnvironmental scienceTemperate rainforestTemperate climateBiosphere modelCarbon cycleCarbon fluxEcologyClimatologyAtmospheric sciencesGeologyEcosystemBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Changing climatic conditions pose a challenge to accurately estimating the carbon sequestration potential of terrestrial vegetation, which is often mediated by nitrogen availability. The close coupling between the nitrogen and carbon cycles controls plant productivity and shapes the structure and functional dynamics of ecosystems. However, how carbon and nitrogen interactions affect both carbon fluxes and plant functional traits in dynamic ecotones, which are experiencing biotic and abiotic changes, remains unclear. In this work, we use in situ measurements of leaf chlorophyll content (ChlLeaf, 2013–2016) and the leaf area index (LAI, 1998–2018) to parameterize the seasonal dynamics of the QUINCY (QUantifying Interactions between terrestrial Nutrient CYcles and the climate system) terrestrial biosphere model (TBM) to simulate the carbon fluxes at the Borden Forest Research Station flux tower site, Ontario, Canada, over 22 years from 1996 to 2018. Our goals are to assess the additional value of using ChlLeaf in the model parameterization, to study how well QUINCY can capture observed trends related to the carbon cycle at the site, and to investigate how well the processes associated with a drought year and its legacy effects are captured by the model. QUINCY was able to simulate leaf-level maximum carboxylation capacity (Vc(max),25), ChlLeaf and leaf nitrogen in a manner quite consistent with observations. The model with the improved parameterization captured observed daily gross primary production (GPP) well (r2=0.80, root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.2 µmolm-2s-1). Nevertheless, we found that although observed GPP increased significantly during the study period (22.4 gCm2yr-1yr-1) and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) shifted towards a stronger sink, these trends were not captured in the model. Instead, QUINCY showed a significant increasing trend for total ecosystem respiration (TER) that was not present in the observations. The severe drought in 2007 strongly affected observed carbon fluxes, lowering both GPP and TER in the following year as well. QUINCY was able to capture some of the decrease in GPP and TER in 2007. However, the legacy effect of the drought in 2008 was not captured by the model. These results call for further work on representing legacy effects in TBMs, as these can have long-lasting impacts on ecosystem functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiogeosciencesSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207