MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409333302 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02873-24

Still not sterile: viability-based assessment of the skin microbiome following pre-surgical application of a broad-spectrum antiseptic reveals transient pathogen enrichment and long-term recovery

2025· article· en· W4409333302 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth C. Townsend, Kayla Xu, Karinda De La Cruz, Lynda Huang, Shelby Sandstrom, Delanie Arend, Owen Gromek, John Scarborough, Anna Huttenlocher, Angela Gibson, Lindsay Kalan

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsBioburdenAntisepticMicrobiomeMicrobiologyBiologyPropidium monoazideMedicineSurgeryBioinformaticsPathologyReal-time polymerase chain reaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Broad-spectrum antiseptics such as chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) have widespread use as pre-surgical tools to lower skin microbial burden and reduce the risk of surgical site infection. However, the short- and long-term effects of CHG on healthy skin microbial communities remain undefined due to the confounding effects of CHG binding with persistent bacterial DNA on the skin surface. Here, we aim to accurately characterize the immediate and long-term impact of pre-surgical preparation with CHG-based antiseptics on the human skin microbiome. Twenty-eight patients undergoing elective surgeries were enrolled. Swabs of the surgical site and a control site skin microbiome were collected at multiple time points before and up to 2 weeks after surgery. A propidium monoazide (PMAxx)-based viability assay was optimized to selectively evaluate DNA from live microbes in complex skin microbial communities with viability-qPCR and viable 16S ribosomal RNA gene profiling. Pre-operative CHG induces a measurable reduction in the viable microbial bioburden at the surgical site. On the day of surgery, surgical sites displayed a significant increase in the relative abundance of several SSI-associated bacterial genera including Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Escherichia-Shigella, and Pseudomonas compared to baseline. Bacillus species isolated from subjects at baseline also demonstrate resistance to CHG with minimum inhibitory concentrations exceeding 1,000 µg/mL. Although there are major skin microbiome shifts upon exposure to CHG, we also find that these shifts are largely transient. For the majority of individuals, skin microbial bioburden and community structure recover to near baseline by post-surgical follow-up. IMPORTANCE Surgical site infections continue to occur despite widespread adoption of surgical antiseptics. Before surgery, patients often wash their whole body multiple times with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-based antiseptic soap and have CHG applied to the surgical site in the operating room. However, the effects of CHG antiseptics on the healthy skin microbiome are undefined due to CHG persisting and binding DNA from dead cells on the skin. We optimized a viability assay to selectively target DNA from live microbes on the skin before and after exposure to CHG. Our findings demonstrate that pre-surgical application of CHG significantly reduces the bioburden on skin; however, potentially pathogenic bacteria remain. Post-surgery, the skin microbiome eventually recovers to resemble its pre-CHG exposed state. Collectively, these findings identify tangible avenues for improving antiseptic formulations and further support that the skin microbiome is viable, stable, and resilient to chemical perturbation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207