Bibliographic record
Abstract
method", 70 Academic career after Congo, 134-137 Accidents of GTM, 67 Accounts, 170 "Acontextual description", 66 Active process, 55 American sociological theory, 122, 124 Analytical process, appeal to, 177-178 Analytic induction, 69 Analytic interruptus, 52, 57 Analytic realism, 87-88 Anselm Strauss, 49 Anti-imperialist commitments, 132 Anti-racist commitments, 132 Apagoge, 70-71 Appropriation, 122-123 Artificial life, 18 Artificial settings, 9-10 Audio-visual recordings, 37, 40-41 Audio-visual technology, 10, 13-15 Authenticity, 94 Authoritarian position, 15 Autoethnographic reflections, 177 Avoidance tactics, 170 Awareness, 50, 53-54, 66 Balanced self, 98 Bandwagon effect, 180 Basics of Grounded Theory, 62-63 Basics of Qualitative Research (BQA), 58-63 Becoming of self, 100-101 Belgian Congo, 138 Bessie Faris, 127 "Big data", 114 "Black box" approach, 112 "Blank mind", 59 "Bodycam", 85 Boys in White project, 52-54 Breaching experiments, 26, 29-30, 38-39, 170 Buffer, 97-98 Canada, born in, 172 Casement report and aftermath, 130-134 Causal identification, 111-112 Causal inference, 111-112 Causality, 111-112 Center for Research on Interpersonal Behavior (CRIB), 26-27 Chicago amalgam, 52-57 Chicago school, 54, 59, 122-123 colonial experience impacts on Faris's academic career, 134-145 decolonial sociology, 122-124 Ellsworth Faris and colonial Congo, 124-134 Classic grounded theory, 4-5, 58 "Classic GTM", 51-52 Collective accomplishments, 34 Colonial Congo, 124-134 casement report and aftermath, 130-134 Ellsworth Faris as missionary, 124-127 ethnologist and witness to atrocities, 127-130 Colonialism, 122-123, 132 Colonial ordering process, 129 Colonial sociology, 127-128 Colonial violence, 122 187 colonial experience impacts on Faris's academic career, 134-145 decolonial sociology, 122-124 Ellsworth Faris and colonial Congo, 124-134 Communication, 36 research approach, 80 Community, 94, 98 policing, 84 Comparative linguistic work, 127-128 Computer technology, 80 Concepts, 94 Conceptualization, 16 Concrete reasonableness, 55 Conditioning process, 110 Conditions, 110 Confrontational relationship, 97-98 Congo Reform Association, 131 Congo academic career after, 134-137 sociological field expeditions to, 143-145 Constant comparative method, 69 Constant comparison, 60 Constructing theories, 59 Contemporary developments, 26 Contemporary symbolic interactionists, 31-32 "Context-dependent", 66 Contextualize industrialization, 110 Contingency, 109-110 Continual Permutations of Action (CPoA), 52, 55, 63 Conventional media, 88 Conversation, 15, 20, 36 Correlations, 112 Corroboration, appeal to, 179-180 Couch's laboratory experiments, 27 Counterfactual causality, 111-112 Counting methods, 15 Creative aspects of research, 51 Criminological theory, 107-108 Criminology, 114-115 Cultural forms, 26
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.765 | 0.626 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".