MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409340562 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.200316

Microencapsulation of Betacyanin from Dragon Fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) Peel by Foam-Mat Drying for Natural Food Colorant Application

2025· article· en· W4409340562 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amila Firdhauzi, Debi Krisna Normasari, Edia Rahayuningsih, Chusnul Hidayat, Indriana Kartini, Widiastuti Setyaningsih

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
KeywordsFood scienceNatural foodNatural (archaeology)ChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing demand for natural food colorants highlights the potential of betacyanin, a red-violet pigment from dragon fruit (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peel, valued for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties.However, its application is limited by sensitivity to heat, light, and pH variations.This study aimed to enhance the stability and usability of betacyanin as a natural food coloring agent through microencapsulation using the foam-mat drying method.The extraction process was optimized using ultrasound-assisted extraction with a Box-Behnken Design (BBD) 3 levels (X1: temperature; X2: solvent concentration; X3: solid to solvent ratio) and a total of 15 experiments to maximize total betacyanin content and color intensity.Foaming agents were screened, with SP exhibiting the highest foam expansion and stability among commercial foaming agents.The foam was subsequently dried at 60℃ under vacuum to produce a stable, bioactive powder.The foam-mat drying resulted in encapsulated betacyanin with favorable properties, including high solubility of around 80% and encapsulation efficiency of up to 85%, making it suitable for applications in the food industry as a natural coloring agent.Moreover, foam-mat microencapsulation is more cost-effective and easier to implement than microencapsulation using spray drying.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207