MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409343116 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145470

Vanadium recovery with barium slag as a roasting additive: A novel waste-to-value approach

2025· article· en· W4409343116 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongrui Yue, Xiangxin Xue, Jing Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cleaner Production · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRoastingBariumVanadiumSlag (welding)Waste managementValue (mathematics)MetallurgyEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vanadium slag (V-slag), a byproduct of iron smelting, is the primary industrial source of vanadium. In this study, we propose a novel ‘Waste-to-Value’ approach by utilizing barium slag (Ba-slag)—a residue generated in the production of BaCO 3 from barite—as an additive in the roasting process of vanadium extraction. V-slag was mixed with Ba-slag, roasted in air, and subsequently leached with sulfuric acid. A series of leaching experiments were conducted, varying additive ratios, roasting temperatures, and holding times to identify optimal conditions. The ideal parameters—an additive ratio of 0.5, roasting temperature of 900 °C, and a holding time of 2 hours— achieved a leaching efficiency of 93.65 %, which is comparable to the reported sodium and calcification methods using pure chemical additives and demonstrates the effectives of the present method. Comprehensive characterization and analysis results confirmed that the mechanism behind using Ba-slag as a vanadium roasting additive involves the oxidation of V 3+ within the spinel phase to V 2 O 5 , which then reacts with BaO—primarily produced from BaCO 3 decomposition—to form leachable Ba 3 (VO 4 ) 2 . Additionally, we separated the overall reaction process by deconvolution of the DTG curves, from room temperature to 1000 °C, into several stages, including fayalite oxidation, spinel oxidation, and barium slag devolatilization. Finally, we determined the activation energy and kinetic model function of each process based on the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cleaner ProductionSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207