MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electroencephalography estimates brain age in infants with high precision: Leveraging advanced machine learning in healthcare

2025· article· en· W4409343338 on OpenAlex
Saeideh Davoudi, Gabriela López‐Arango, Florence Deguire, Inga S. Knoth, Fanny Thébault‐Dagher, Rebecca K. Reh, Laurel J. Trainor, Janet F. Werker, Sarah Lippé

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéUniversity of Texas at AustinCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchKids Brain Health NetworkNational Science Foundation
KeywordsElectroencephalographyHealth careComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• First postnatal life is a critical period marked by rapid brain changes. • Developing brain follows a trajectory of increased non-linearity and complexity. • Brain age gap (BAG) can be a tool for early assessment of pediatric development. • Deep learning networks can cope with the multidimensional characteristics of EEG. • Infants’ alpha (6–9 Hz) plays a significant role during the first postnatal life. Changes in the pace of neurodevelopment are key indicators of atypical maturation during early life. Unfortunately, reliable prognostic tools rely on assessments of cognitive and behavioral skills that develop towards the second year of life and after. Early assessment of brain maturation using electroencephalography (EEG) is crucial for clinical intervention and care planning. We developed a reliable methodology using conventional machine learning (ML) and novel deep learning (DL) networks to efficiently quantify the difference between chronological and biological age, so-called brain age gap (BAG) as a marker of accelerated/decelerated biological brain development. In this cross-sectional study, EEG from 219 typically-developing infants aged from three to 14-months was used. For DL networks, the input samples were increased to 2628 recordings. We further validated the BAG tool in a population at clinical risk with abnormal brain growth (macrocephaly) to capture deviation from normal aging. Our results indicate that DL networks outperform conventional ML models, capturing complex non-monotonic EEG characteristics and predicting the biological age with a mean absolute error of only one month (MAE = 1 month, 95 %CI:0.88–1.15, r = 0.82, 95 %CI:0.78–0.85). Additionally, the developing brain follows a trajectory characterized by increased non-linearity and complexity in which alpha rhythm plays an important role. BAG could detect group-level maturational delays between typically-developing and macrocephaly ( p v a l u e = 0.009 ) . In macrocephaly, BAG negatively correlated with the general adaptive composite of the ABAS-II ( p v a l u e = 0.04 ) at 18-months and the information processing speed scale of the WPSSI-IV at age four ( p v a l u e = 0.006 ). The EEG-based BAG score offers a reliable non-invasive measure of brain maturation, with significant advantages and implications for developmental neuroscience and clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it