MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409346864 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofaf005

Frequency, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, and Molecular Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Stratified by United States Census Divisions: Results From the INFORM Program (2018–2022)

2025· article· en· W4409346864 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hélio S. Sader, John H. Kimbrough, Timothy B Doyle, Marisa Winkler, Mariana Castanheira

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAbbVie Canada
KeywordsMedicineCensusCarbapenemAntimicrobialFamily medicineGerontologyEnvironmental healthMicrobiologyAntibioticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Recently approved β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam, have demonstrated a broad spectrum of activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) from US hospitals, but resistance may emerge with the increasing use of these compounds. Aztreonam-avibactam was recently approved in Europe and it is under clinical development in the United States. We evaluated the activity of aztreonam-avibactam and comparators against CREs from US hospitals. Methods A total of 45 497 Enterobacterales isolates were consecutively collected from 79 US medical centers (36 states) and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. Aztreonam-avibactam was tested with avibactam at a fixed 4 mg/L and a susceptible breakpoint of ≤4 mg/L was applied for comparison. CRE isolates were screened for carbapenemase by whole-genome sequencing. Results Aztreonam-avibactam inhibited >99.9% of Enterobacterales at ≤4 mg/L. CRE frequencies varied from 0.2% (New England) to 2.4% (Middle Atlantic). Aztreonam-avibactam was active (minimum inhibitory concentration ≤4 mg/L) against 98.6% (408/414) of CREs overall, whereas susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam were lowest in the Mountain division (67.7% and 74.2%, respectively) and highest (100.0%) in West North Central. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase was the most common carbapenemase (65.5% of CREs), followed by New Delhi MBL (10.6%) and oxacillinase-48–like (2.7%). The occurrence of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase among CREs varied from 14.3% (New England) to 77.8% (East South Central), whereas the frequency of MBLs ranged from ≤3.0% (4 divisions) to 19.4% in Mountain and 42.9% in New England. Conclusions Aztreonam-avibactam showed potent activity against CRE, including MBL producers. Resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam was observed among CRE because of increasing occurrence of MBL-producing isolates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207