Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or Positional Therapy Compared to Control for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy: Protocol for Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder, and in pregnancy, it is associated with an increased risk of complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia. Supine sleep may worsen OSA, and in pregnancy, it is associated with an increased risk of stillbirth due to effects on fetomaternal blood flow. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is considered the gold-standard treatment for moderate to severe OSA, although compliance is frequently poor; positional therapy (PT) is generally less effective than CPAP in nonpregnant patients but may be better tolerated and more accessible during pregnancy. There is limited data on whether widespread, early screening for sleep disorders in pregnant women with symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing or at high risk of metabolic complications and subsequent early intervention with CPAP or PT attenuates fetomaternal risks. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess improved fetomaternal outcomes in a high-risk pregnant population with OSA, using CPAP or PT, initiated by the 16th week of gestation. METHODS: This study is a randomized, controlled, open-label feasibility study in which pregnant women with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) or respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥5 are treated with CPAP (auto-titrating and fixed pressure) or positional therapy from early gestation (by 16 weeks) until delivery. The primary outcome is the feasibility of the study protocol and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus by the 28-week gestation period. Secondary outcomes include the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), maternal weight gain, uterine artery blood flow, glycemic control during pregnancy (in participants who develop gestational diabetes), changes in maternal circulating biomarkers, and neonatal birthweight complications. Polysomnography at 28- to 32-week gestation period, postpartum polysomnography, therapy compliance, and patient acceptability are also assessed. RESULTS: The trial commenced on September 30, 2019. The trial is ongoing as of August 6, 2024. CONCLUSIONS: The trial intends to contribute to the growing evidence base to support the need for the identification and treatment of OSA occurring during pregnancy and to assess the feasibility of the study protocol. This will be the first trial to compare the early initiation of CPAP (auto-titrating and fixed pressure) and positional therapy in pregnant women from early gestation, providing alternative therapies for the treatment of OSA in this important population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001530112; https://tinyurl.com/yctdzs4u. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/51434.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".