MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409349452 · doi:10.5382/econgeo.5144

Trace Element Geochemistry of Li-Rich Pegmatites in the Carolina Tin-Spodumene Belt, North Carolina, USA: Implications for Petrogenesis and Exploration

2025· article· en· W4409349452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam Curry, Michael A. Wise, Russell S. Harmon

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrogenesisGeologyPegmatiteSpodumeneGeochemistryTrace elementTinMantle (geology)Metallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Carolina tin-spodumene belt, North Carolina, hosts one of the largest economic deposits of Li pegmatite ore in the United States, yet the petrogenesis of Carolina tin-spodumene belt pegmatites remains poorly understood. We use whole-rock and mineral trace element geochemistry to (1) evaluate the petrogenesis of Carolina tin-spodumene belt pegmatites, (2) compare their geochemistry to other Li-rich pegmatites worldwide, and (3) propose mineral chemistry indices for Li mineralization. Trace element modeling demonstrates that spodumene-bearing pegmatites are not related to the nearby Cherryville Granite through fractional crystallization, and rare earth element contents in plagioclase, garnet, and apatite indicate that spodumene-bearing pegmatites are also not derived from spodumene-free pegmatites. We prefer a petrogenesis in which both types of pegmatites and the Cherryville Granite are derived through similar, but individual, crustal anatectic events. Muscovite and K-feldspar K/Rb-Li systematics indicate that Carolina tin-spodumene belt pegmatites do not attain fractionation levels as high as those reached in the Oxford County pegmatite field in Maine or the Custer and Keystone pegmatite fields in South Dakota. Quartz and garnet Li abundances in Carolina tin-spodumene belt pegmatites are some of the highest in the world, and garnet rare earth element concentrations are the lowest. Contents of Ga, Mn, Ge, and Ti in spodumene allow for discrimination of pegmatites from the Carolina tin-spodumene belt, Maine, South Dakota, Canada, and Portugal. Based on this extensive trace element study, plagioclase, K-feldspar, quartz, muscovite, garnet, and apatite chemistry offer a comprehensive methodology to distinguish pegmatites with and without spodumene in the Carolina tin-spodumene belt, which may be useful in exploration for Li pegmatite ore worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207