Systemic 4-1BB stimulation augments extrafollicular memory B cell formation and recall responses during Plasmodium infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T-dependent germinal center (GC) output, comprising plasma cells and memory B cells (MBCs), is crucial for clearance of Plasmodium infection and protection against reinfection. In this study, we examine the effect of an agonistic antibody targeting 4-1BB (CD137) during experimental malaria. We show that exogenous 4-1BB stimulation, despite delaying the effector GC response, surprisingly enhances humoral memory recall and protection from reinfection. Single-cell RNA and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin (ATAC) sequencing of MBCs from mice receiving 4-1BB stimulation reveal populations with distinct transcriptional signatures and a chromatin landscape indicative of superior recall and proliferative potential. Importantly, our results indicate that the effects of 4-1BB stimulation are dependent on interleukin (IL)-9R signaling in B cells but independent of parasite load during primary infection. Our study proposes an immunomodulatory approach to enhance the quality of the MBC pool, providing superior protection during infection and vaccination, particularly in the context of malaria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".