Vascular plant biomass and herbivore disturbance, but not summer temperature, explain satellite and drone-based NDVI in High Arctic Svalbard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) is a critical tool for studying Arctic vegetation patterns and changes, but more knowledge is needed about its links with plant biomass and disturbances, especially in sparsely vegetated habitats in the High Arctic. Here, we investigate the relationship between NDVI and vascular plant biomass, summer temperature, goose disturbance, and winter damage in Dryas ridge and moss tundra habitats on Svalbard, all recorded in the corresponding year across a 5-year time series. We test these relationships using mixed-effect models at two spatial resolutions (10 cm and 10 m) and two extents with data from drone and Sentinel-2 imagery. We found that in our plots, an increase in biomass of 100 g m−2 increased NDVI from drone imagery by 0.08 ± 0.03 (95% CI) for Dryas ridge and by 0.04 ± 0.03 for moss tundra. Despite record-warm summers, temperature of the same summer was not associated with NDVI in our time-series. In moss tundra, severe goose disturbance had a negative relationship with drone NDVI in plots, while in Dryas ridge habitat, winter damage had no clear correspondence with NDVI. Our study provides an example of context dependencies highlighted in remote-sensing literature in the Arctic, encouraging future studies to include effects of disturbance on NDVI and to establish habitat-specific relationships with NDVI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".