MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409356791 · doi:10.1109/tie.2025.3555039

Demagnetization Fault Detection of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Through Voltage Excitation at Standstill Condition

2025· article· en· W4409356791 on OpenAlexafffund
Shiva Garaei, Chunyan Lai, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExcitationSynchronous motorMagnetVoltageDemagnetizing fieldPermanent magnet synchronous generatorFault (geology)Control theory (sociology)AC motorPermanent magnet motorElectrical engineeringPhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringGeologyMagnetic fieldSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permanent magnet demagnetization (PMD) faults can result in reduced motor performance and reliability in the permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive system. Existing PMD detection methods can be invasive or easily influenced by machine parameter variations, loading conditions, and other faults of the machine. This article introduces a noninvasive and computationally efficient approach to diagnose PMD faults of PMSMs at standstill which is independent of the machine operating conditions. In the proposed approach, a set of excitation voltages is designed and fed by the inverter to produce a current in the machine, thereby causing a magnetic flux variation in the PMSM at standstill. The PMD fault indicator is defined based on the corresponding current signal. More specifically, the phase currents are measured and processed to determine the PMD level by comparing with the healthy state current. In this article, it is also found that a position-dependent torque oscillation can be generated during the voltage excitation at standstill. Therefore, this article also addresses the torque oscillation issue under all different rotor positions. In addition, the permanent magnet (PM) flux linkage can be determined with the proposed approach. Extensive tests are conducted to validate the proposed approach in detecting PMD faults and determining the PM flux linkage experimentally and in simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207