MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409360158 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2024-0055

Study on residual stress effects to cracking in the injection molding product—a case study of CPVC male threaded adapter fittings with copper insert

2025· article· en· W4409360158 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Doan Hung Vo, Hsi-Hsun Tsai, Yi-Ling Liao, Sin-He Chen, Jiawei Liu, Jin-Wei Liang, Minh Thong Tran

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersĐại học Đà Nẵng
KeywordsResidual stressMaterials scienceMolding (decorative)CrackingInsert (composites)Adapter (computing)CopperComposite materialEngineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metal/alloy insert threaded polymer fittings are currently being widely used due to their outstanding advantages due to the combination of mechanical properties between polymers and metals/alloys. However, research and literature on metal insert thread adapter fittings are still limited nowadays. This study focuses on chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) male threaded adapters with copper insert and their cracking for the purpose of conducting an insert threaded fitting literature. Crackings are generated by residual stresses accumulating internally over time, unobservable immediately after creating products. This study has discovered cracking by experiment and reduced residual stress by optimizing process parameters via the Taguchi method and mold–insert temperature survey, based on the Moldex3D simulation model. Furthermore, dimensional accuracy is ensured through the warpage displacement assessment. These methods could assist manufacturers in getting pilot-run samples to determine the suitable process parameters, ensuring the longevity of CPVC male threaded adapters with copper insert in particular and piping systems in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicInjection Molding Process and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207