Acoustic-to-Hyper-Spectral: Hyper-Spectral Image Construction from Frequency Spectrums Through Simulated Annealing (Student Abstract)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This abstract presents a simulated annealing based approach that constructs hyper-spectral images from the frequency spectrums of a distributed acoustic sensing system and iteratively improves them through the training of learnable filters. The aim is to construct an image that represents features of signals from events while repressing noise. Hyper-spectral images are specifically created for downstream computer vision tasks such as object detection. Hyper-spectral images are images with more than three channels that are derived from a frequency spectrum to obtain the spectrum for each image pixel. Simulated annealing is used to train the filters to automatically select frequencies and bin them into frequency bands. Each frequency band is mapped into an image channel. We fully integrate our filtering method with an object detection network so that filters are trained in conjunction with the neural network. The detection model serves as both the measure and the selector. Our simulated annealing approach significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art methods by a margin of 22%. Limitations include a dependency on randomness and excluding parts of the search space prematuraly due to the design of the local moves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".