Characterization and performance of the Apollon main short-pulse laser beam following its commissioning at 2 PW level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the results of the second commissioning phase of the short-focal-length area of the Apollon laser facility, located in Saclay, France. This phase was conducted using the main laser beam (F1), scaled to a peak power of 2 PW. Under the tested conditions, the F1 beam delivered on-target pulses with a maximum energy of up to 45 J and a duration of 22 fs. Several diagnostics were deployed to assess the facility's performance. Key measurements included the on-target focal spot and its spatial stability, along with characterizations of secondary sources generated by irradiating solid targets. These evaluations aim at assisting users in designing future experiments. The laser-target interactions were thoroughly characterized, with emissions of energetic ions, x rays, and neutrons recorded, demonstrating good laser-to-target coupling efficiency. Additionally, we successfully demonstrated the simultaneous operation of the F1 beam with the auxiliary 0.5 PW F2 beam of Apollon, enabling dual-beam operation. This commissioning phase paves the way for the next stage in 2025, which will involve scaling the F1 beam to 8 PW, progressing toward the ultimate goal of achieving 10 PW power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".