Motion Decoupled 3D Gaussian Splatting for Dynamic Object Representation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic object modeling is a critical challenge in 3D scene reconstruction. Previous methods typically maintain a canonical space to represent the object model, and a deformation field to express the object motion. However, this approach fails when the object undergoes large motions. The position variation caused by significant motion not only complicates the establishment of a canonical space, but also misleads the interpretation of the deformation field. To overcome the above weaknesses, we propose Motion Decoupled Dynamic 3D Gaussian Splatting (M5D-GS), the first 3D-GS model that separates motion and deformation modeling for dynamic object representation with large motion from a monocular camera. M5D-GS increases the practicality of 3D-GS, as it is common for objects to move, rotate, and deform simultaneously. Current datasets only contain object deformations with slight motions. We introduce a pipeline to reuse current benchmarks by adding large motions into the scene. We also introduce a new benchmark featuring several new scenes with complex motions, scenes augmented from previous datasets, and some real world recorded testcases, to fully demonstrate our improvements. Our M5D-GS significantly increases the accuracy under large motion scenarios while maintaining high rendering speed, which makes it suitable for dynamic object representation tasks including 4D novel view synthesis and real-time rendering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".