MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409369952 · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.025

Identification and diagnosis of chronic heart disease: A deep learning-based hybrid approach

2025· article· en· W4409369952 on OpenAlexaff
Hazrat Bilal, Yar Muhammad, Inam Ullah, Sahil Garg, Bong Jun Choi, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueAlexandria Engineering Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Artificial intelligenceChronic diseaseComputer scienceMedicineMachine learningInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic heart disease has emerged as a challenging issue in the healthcare sector that needs serious attention to save the lives of millions of cardiac patients. The precise diagnosis of this disease in the early stages can reduce the devastating effect it has on human life. To address this issue, this study proposes a hybrid deep learning (DL)-based approach that combines two versatile DL models, namely, bidirectional long-short-term memory (BLSTM) and bidirectional gated recurrent unit (BGRU), resulting in an efficient hybrid DL model named BLSTM-BGRU. The BLSTM part captures long-term relationships between dataset attributes, guaranteeing the preservation of the patient’s historical data, which is essential for forecasting the patient’s health conditions. The BGRU part improves the computing efficiency of the model by lowering the number of trainable parameters and reducing the effect of vanishing gradient problems. The integration of BLSTM and BGRU helps the model to learn the short-term variations and long-range dependencies in heart disease attributes such as heart rate, respiratory rate, etc. The proposed model captures contextual dependency in forward and backward directions, resulting in improved heart disease diagnostic accuracy by learning long-range relationships between attributes and complex sequences. To determine the efficiency of the BLSTM-BGRU model, the MIT-BIH dataset, which consists of five different types of ECG signals, was used. The dataset consists of more normal class samples than the rest of the four classes. Therefore, we used the SMOTE dataset balancing technique to balance the dataset, thereby avoiding the model overfitting problem and improving its efficiency. Alongside the proposed model, we also investigated the performance of four other of the most versatile DL models on both unbalanced and balanced datasets. The proposed model achieved training and testing accuracy of 99.90% and 99.58% on an unbalanced dataset and 99.95% and 99.70%, respectively, on a balanced dataset. The results highlight the importance of the proposed BLSTM-BGRU model using both balanced and unbalanced datasets, showing its significance and versatility for the identification of heart disease, resulting in enhanced heart disease prevention and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlexandria Engineering JournalSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207